The BJP on Wednesday said Vijay Mallya has had no alternate of coronary heart and he became no longer inclined to clean his loans because the law becomes catching up with the fugitive liquor baron.
“This isn’t always an alternate of heart that he wants to pay off the money (to banks) but the truth is that the law is catching up with people who felt entitled to play with the regulation,” spokesperson Sambit Patra informed the media.
Mallya, dealing with a Rs 9,000 crore Kingfisher Airline mortgage default case, on Tuesday made public a letter.
The “Heartland” is regularly synonymous with Uttar Pradesh (UP) in India that who rules UP shall have political advantages within the character of the critical executive. But, over a while, the election of Gujarat become too end up extra contentious betweenevents (Congress Party and BJP). The manner each side of leadership involved within the Gujarat Assembly election (2017) reminded the peoples that how Gujarat is crucial for each the facet. But, my situation is that how Gujarat is one-of-a-kind or similar from UP? Why did new leadership emerge inside Gujarat than UP? How both the state became suspicious for Muslims in shape of leadership?
The political situation in both the country is not like to ‘do or die’ for political survival. But, through the years Gujarat emerged as the political heartland for BJP to shape and save the political legacy of Hindutva. Though, BJP reiterated that improvement is their new darling which they may be overemphasized due to the fact 2014. At what ground we can equate Gujarat as consistent with UP as heartland in Indian Politics. The similarity and differences between both the states can recognize via lenses of politics.
The difference between UP and Gujarat can amount in the time period of nearby political parties. In UP, there are three robust nearby political parties (SP, BSP, and RLD) while different minors but no longer influential. In Gujarat, the absence of strong regional political parties in contrast to UP who can dent or challenged at some volume made this Gujarat election more fascinated than UP election held yr again. However, BJP wins the election via slender margin from Congress Party. The photo of the political leadership of both the countrywide political parties (Congress Party and BJP) changed into exceptional in evaluating at the gift. The Popularity graph of Rahul Gandhi and Narendra Modi has modified in among each the election (UP and Gujarat). This happened because of Congress Party too hired social media professionals to counter the BJP. Of course, GST and demonetization can be some other cause. The business index of Gujarat is better than UP, for this reason, it can be envisioned that Gujarat might have a greater effect on GST and demonetization than UP. During UP election, the impact of demonetization changed into open especially among small political groups and some extension it turned into up to Congress Party as properly. The similarity between both the states: in each the states Congress Party are far away from the power of greater than two decades and trying difficult to regain those states. However, BJP emerged within the strength from both those states and experimented with Hindutva ideology in numerous scale time to time to polarise the voters of their realm.
Unlike Hardik Patel, Jignesh Mehwani, and Alpesh Thakor (HGA)s why not a few Muslim leaders emerged who’ve social base and motivated over Muslims hundreds? What eroded within the network? Why put up impartial India do not produce single Muslims leader who’ve mass base in contrast to Maulana Azad? Of route, there are many Muslims leaders who’re within the Parliament and Legislative Assembly as well but have the slim base and their influence is restricted to unique barriers. Indeed, Hardik Patel, Jignesh Mehwani, and Alpesh Thakur have too geographical obstacles and they may be surrounded in Gujarat. What the else cause for this, lately UP assemblybut there has been no leader who can draw the media lenses or people’s interest. Is Muslims away from social troubles or they’re not worried in the politics? Muslims are very a whole lot in the politics, however, what else purpose that the network does not shape single leader who can mobilize the network at high-quality no matter problems along with the problem of triple talaq?
Before searching into the viable motives the difficulty is not a day product it’s far attached with various socio-cultural views wherein the Muslims society does no longer stand firmly behind it or not able to barter with others at high-quality. For me, it is attitude greater than operational. The attitude does depend in numerous ways. It has many dimensions which pull attentions past the spatial obstacles. But at what perspective and for whom. Among the motives, the emergence of such management push the community to think significantly? However, on the identical time, Muslims do now not care tons in this the front? How lengthy are they able to move without leadership or being heard as the sectarian block than divided? The emergence of such leadership (HGAs) of the route a cumulative product and churning of time that required that is due over time. But, why not such churning passed off in among Muslims community? How long will it likely take place? The following motives are probably instrumental at the back of the emergence of such management.
First, the political requirement-the emergence of (HGAs) changed into due inside Gujarat considering the fact that long again after Mahatma Gandhi and Sardar Patel who had exquisite contributions throughout freedom conflict. Of direction, the twenty- years rule of BJP made frustration among backward groups in form of an outburst of (HGAs) management and that they challenged the incumbent govt. Together with Indian Nation Congress Party of India. The developing unemployment among backward groups (specifically among Patidars) and Dalits have ignited the fireplace or in other words, the disparity among rich and bad accelerated over time.
In UP, there was no such political outrage of lengthy political ruling alternatively each SP and BSP played an active role to suppress the emergence of Muslims leaderships who could have suited beyond limitations like HGAs who became applicable beyond obstacles in Gujarat.
The area of heartland if situated in UP very firmly due to legislative length but Gujarat turned into now not some distance lower back to play a crucial role for the duration of election to shape the politics of Muslims inside us of a.